Building a successful business is all about a simple premise: you solve a real problem for real customers. However, most companies fail because they create products that no one truly needs. Now that we've discussed how to approach finding the right problem to solve, let's dive into discovering a suitable solution for that problem. This is where the Problem-Solution Fit comes into play.
Problem-Solution Fit means you’ve identified a deep, genuine problem in the market and designed a solution that resonates with a specific group of customers. It’s the first critical milestone on the startup roadmap, preceding Product-Market Fit.
Problem-Solution Fit (PSF) is the phase in a startup’s journey when founders can confidently say, “Yes, we have identified a significant problem that needs solving and have a solution that works." This usually happens in the early stages (pre-seed or seed stage) before the startup grows, often involving a small group of test users or early customers.
PSF is about making sure you’re solving the right problem, while PMF is about scaling that solution to more people.
Problem-Solution Fit (PSF) = you found a group of target customers who have a significant problem that your solution can solve. These early users are willing to try an unfinished version of your product because it addresses their main issue. They accept missing features and workarounds as long as the solution resolves their key pain point.
Example
Airbnb’s founders started by renting out an air mattress in their apartment when a design conference caused a hotel shortage – they validated that travelers with no hotel options would pay to stay in a stranger’s home, and that hosts were willing to rent out space for extra income. Those first few paying guests during the 2008 conference were evidence of PSF – a real problem (no affordable lodging during big events) met with a scrappy solution.
Product-Market Fit (PMF) = after PSF you built out the product with more features and polishto appeal to a broader market, and prove that the business can consistently acquire customers and generate revenue.
Example
After the conference's success, the Airbnb founders knew they had something. They got into Y Combinator and expanded to cities (like New York) where hotel shortages were common. Only once they saw strangers using Airbnb regularly (not just during events) and returning to the platform did they reach true Product-Market Fit.
Here's a (very) simplified mental framework to think about the steps to achieve the PSF.
We've covered this topic in our previous lessons. Here, we just want to remind you that every startup begins with an idea, which usually includes some notion of a problem and a solution. Instead of rushing to build the solution, start by deepening your understanding of the problem. Remember that a good startup problem is:
Make sure you:
A great exercise is to fill in the blanks: [Customer] struggles with [Problem] whenever [Situation], resulting in [Consequences]. For instance, “Inventory managers at mid-size retail companies struggle with out-of-stock surprises whenever they rely on manual inventory tracking, resulting in lost sales and customer dissatisfaction.”
Once you have evidence that a compelling problem exists, you can start shaping your solution hypothesis. This is where you outline how you intend to solve the problem in a way that’s significantly better than current alternatives.We recommend starting with two types of hypotheses: the value hypothesis and the growth hypothesis.
The value hypothesis tests whether the solution will create value for the customer. To determine this, we suggest asking the following questions:
The growth hypothesis tests how new customers will adopt your solution. To determine this, consider the following questions:
After forming your hypotheses, the next step is to create a Minimum Viable Product (MVP). An MVP is an early version of your solution that helps you learn from actual data instead of just guessing about the future. It turns your idea into something tangible, even if it's not perfect, and allows you to start testing and improving. Although an MVP might have flaws, the ultimate goal is to develop the best possible product or process while minimizing waste.
MVPs vary greatly depending on what you want to learn. The main point is to keep things simple and efficient. Your aim should be to quickly gather feedback from actual customers about their behaviors, without committing too many resources to a particular idea just yet. For instance, if you think your app needs a feature to predict stock shortages, don’t build that feature right away. First, check if customers actually want an app that notifies them about low stock. You can create a simple test by manually tracking inventory and sending alerts via text to see how customers respond and if they take action.
Always brainstorm multiple MVPs for any project. It's natural to latch onto one idea too soon. We often fixate on a solution we favor, without exploring very different options. Aim to think of at least three alternatives: start with your preferred option, then consider a more extravagant one, and finally, come up with a simplistic idea that is very different in cost and complexity from your original design—something so straightforward that you feel a bit silly for even thinking of it.
What can your MVP look like?A good way to test the effectiveness of an MVP is to see if people are willing to exchange something valuable for it. This value can be money, but it can also include time, energy, reputation, or detailed feedback.
To validate your PSF, get feedback from the people who had the strongest need for your solution. Show them your MVP and see how they react:
Ask follow-up questions like:
If they mention features you don’t have yet, just take note. At this stage, it’s more important to find out which features are absolutely necessary.
This feedback should be:
More importantly: ask for commitment. One of the most telling things you can do at this stage is to gently ask for some form of commitment. For instance, “If this were available next month, do you think you’d start using it?” and even “Would you be willing to pay a small amount to pilot it?”. This is often called pre-selling. You don’t have to actually take their money on the spot (unless you’re ready), but their reaction will be informative. Early evangelists – the truly pain-stricken customers – won’t hesitate to put skin in the game if they believe your solution can really solve their problem. The ultimate test is their willingness to pay for an unfinished product. If you get a lot of polite “Sounds cool, keep me posted” without any commitment, that may signal your solution isn’t yet convincing.
To figure out if you've achieved a PSF ask yourself the following questions (and answer honestly, backed by evidence wherever possible):
You don’t need everything to be perfect to have Problem-Solution Fit, but you should have good evidence. If you have a few real users who really care about the problem, love your solution, and would be unhappy if it disappeared, you likely have Problem-Solution Fit. For example, Airbnb founders knew they had Problem-Solution Fit when strangers (not just friends) started booking through their site.
Hitting a perfect bullseye on your first try is uncommon. However, if each attempt at your solution shows improvement and provides valuable insights, it's important to keep going. Focus on refining your MVP and continue developing your idea.
Sometimes, even when you try your hardest, your product may not succeed right away. Maybe customers aren’t as interested as you hoped, or your solution isn't quite working. This is when you might need to pivot.
A pivot means you change your strategy, but not your overall vision. Founders always have a big vision for what they want to achieve, but how they reach that vision can change. For example, you might adjust who the product is for or add new features. The vision stays the same, but your approach changes. Each time you pivot, you test new set of hypotheses to see what works best.
How do you know it’s time to pivot rather than persevere with your current plan? Look for these indicators:
Pivot Doesn’t Mean Start Over from Scratch: A pivot is often about leveraging what you’ve learned and adjusting direction, not throwing everything away. Here are common types of pivots:
How to Pivot Gracefully: When you identify a pivot, it’s important to do it systematically:
Schedule regular “pivot-or-persevere” meetings, ideally once a month or once a quarter. These meetings help you:
On the flip side, don’t pivot at the first sign of trouble. Early stages are supposed to be challenging. If you have some signals of potential (maybe 2 out of 5 users loved it, or people say “if you just had X feature, I’d use this”), you might iterate rather than pivot – which is more like a minor course correction versus a new direction. Use your judgment and perhaps set criteria or a timeline (“If we still don’t have at least 3 engaged users after another 2 months or after testing these next two hypotheses, then we pivot.”). This prevents thrashing about too quickly or sticking with a lost cause for too long.
Achieving Problem-Solution Fit is a significant milestone – it means you’ve de-risked your startup in a big way by ensuring you’re building something that people truly need. However, it’s not always a quick or easy journey. Here are some closing thoughts and tips as you work toward PSF:
Building a successful business is all about a simple premise: you solve a real problem for real customers. However, most companies fail because they create products that no one truly needs. Now that we've discussed how to approach finding the right problem to solve, let's dive into discovering a suitable solution for that problem. This is where the Problem-Solution Fit comes into play.
Problem-Solution Fit means you’ve identified a deep, genuine problem in the market and designed a solution that resonates with a specific group of customers. It’s the first critical milestone on the startup roadmap, preceding Product-Market Fit.
Problem-Solution Fit (PSF) is the phase in a startup’s journey when founders can confidently say, “Yes, we have identified a significant problem that needs solving and have a solution that works." This usually happens in the early stages (pre-seed or seed stage) before the startup grows, often involving a small group of test users or early customers.
PSF is about making sure you’re solving the right problem, while PMF is about scaling that solution to more people.
Problem-Solution Fit (PSF) = you found a group of target customers who have a significant problem that your solution can solve. These early users are willing to try an unfinished version of your product because it addresses their main issue. They accept missing features and workarounds as long as the solution resolves their key pain point.
Example
Airbnb’s founders started by renting out an air mattress in their apartment when a design conference caused a hotel shortage – they validated that travelers with no hotel options would pay to stay in a stranger’s home, and that hosts were willing to rent out space for extra income. Those first few paying guests during the 2008 conference were evidence of PSF – a real problem (no affordable lodging during big events) met with a scrappy solution.
Product-Market Fit (PMF) = after PSF you built out the product with more features and polishto appeal to a broader market, and prove that the business can consistently acquire customers and generate revenue.
Example
After the conference's success, the Airbnb founders knew they had something. They got into Y Combinator and expanded to cities (like New York) where hotel shortages were common. Only once they saw strangers using Airbnb regularly (not just during events) and returning to the platform did they reach true Product-Market Fit.
Here's a (very) simplified mental framework to think about the steps to achieve the PSF.
We've covered this topic in our previous lessons. Here, we just want to remind you that every startup begins with an idea, which usually includes some notion of a problem and a solution. Instead of rushing to build the solution, start by deepening your understanding of the problem. Remember that a good startup problem is:
Make sure you:
A great exercise is to fill in the blanks: [Customer] struggles with [Problem] whenever [Situation], resulting in [Consequences]. For instance, “Inventory managers at mid-size retail companies struggle with out-of-stock surprises whenever they rely on manual inventory tracking, resulting in lost sales and customer dissatisfaction.”
Once you have evidence that a compelling problem exists, you can start shaping your solution hypothesis. This is where you outline how you intend to solve the problem in a way that’s significantly better than current alternatives.We recommend starting with two types of hypotheses: the value hypothesis and the growth hypothesis.
The value hypothesis tests whether the solution will create value for the customer. To determine this, we suggest asking the following questions:
The growth hypothesis tests how new customers will adopt your solution. To determine this, consider the following questions:
After forming your hypotheses, the next step is to create a Minimum Viable Product (MVP). An MVP is an early version of your solution that helps you learn from actual data instead of just guessing about the future. It turns your idea into something tangible, even if it's not perfect, and allows you to start testing and improving. Although an MVP might have flaws, the ultimate goal is to develop the best possible product or process while minimizing waste.
MVPs vary greatly depending on what you want to learn. The main point is to keep things simple and efficient. Your aim should be to quickly gather feedback from actual customers about their behaviors, without committing too many resources to a particular idea just yet. For instance, if you think your app needs a feature to predict stock shortages, don’t build that feature right away. First, check if customers actually want an app that notifies them about low stock. You can create a simple test by manually tracking inventory and sending alerts via text to see how customers respond and if they take action.
Always brainstorm multiple MVPs for any project. It's natural to latch onto one idea too soon. We often fixate on a solution we favor, without exploring very different options. Aim to think of at least three alternatives: start with your preferred option, then consider a more extravagant one, and finally, come up with a simplistic idea that is very different in cost and complexity from your original design—something so straightforward that you feel a bit silly for even thinking of it.
What can your MVP look like?A good way to test the effectiveness of an MVP is to see if people are willing to exchange something valuable for it. This value can be money, but it can also include time, energy, reputation, or detailed feedback.
To validate your PSF, get feedback from the people who had the strongest need for your solution. Show them your MVP and see how they react:
Ask follow-up questions like:
If they mention features you don’t have yet, just take note. At this stage, it’s more important to find out which features are absolutely necessary.
This feedback should be:
More importantly: ask for commitment. One of the most telling things you can do at this stage is to gently ask for some form of commitment. For instance, “If this were available next month, do you think you’d start using it?” and even “Would you be willing to pay a small amount to pilot it?”. This is often called pre-selling. You don’t have to actually take their money on the spot (unless you’re ready), but their reaction will be informative. Early evangelists – the truly pain-stricken customers – won’t hesitate to put skin in the game if they believe your solution can really solve their problem. The ultimate test is their willingness to pay for an unfinished product. If you get a lot of polite “Sounds cool, keep me posted” without any commitment, that may signal your solution isn’t yet convincing.
To figure out if you've achieved a PSF ask yourself the following questions (and answer honestly, backed by evidence wherever possible):
You don’t need everything to be perfect to have Problem-Solution Fit, but you should have good evidence. If you have a few real users who really care about the problem, love your solution, and would be unhappy if it disappeared, you likely have Problem-Solution Fit. For example, Airbnb founders knew they had Problem-Solution Fit when strangers (not just friends) started booking through their site.
Hitting a perfect bullseye on your first try is uncommon. However, if each attempt at your solution shows improvement and provides valuable insights, it's important to keep going. Focus on refining your MVP and continue developing your idea.
Sometimes, even when you try your hardest, your product may not succeed right away. Maybe customers aren’t as interested as you hoped, or your solution isn't quite working. This is when you might need to pivot.
A pivot means you change your strategy, but not your overall vision. Founders always have a big vision for what they want to achieve, but how they reach that vision can change. For example, you might adjust who the product is for or add new features. The vision stays the same, but your approach changes. Each time you pivot, you test new set of hypotheses to see what works best.
How do you know it’s time to pivot rather than persevere with your current plan? Look for these indicators:
Pivot Doesn’t Mean Start Over from Scratch: A pivot is often about leveraging what you’ve learned and adjusting direction, not throwing everything away. Here are common types of pivots:
How to Pivot Gracefully: When you identify a pivot, it’s important to do it systematically:
Schedule regular “pivot-or-persevere” meetings, ideally once a month or once a quarter. These meetings help you:
On the flip side, don’t pivot at the first sign of trouble. Early stages are supposed to be challenging. If you have some signals of potential (maybe 2 out of 5 users loved it, or people say “if you just had X feature, I’d use this”), you might iterate rather than pivot – which is more like a minor course correction versus a new direction. Use your judgment and perhaps set criteria or a timeline (“If we still don’t have at least 3 engaged users after another 2 months or after testing these next two hypotheses, then we pivot.”). This prevents thrashing about too quickly or sticking with a lost cause for too long.
Achieving Problem-Solution Fit is a significant milestone – it means you’ve de-risked your startup in a big way by ensuring you’re building something that people truly need. However, it’s not always a quick or easy journey. Here are some closing thoughts and tips as you work toward PSF: