Many startups fail because they don’t solve a genuine, urgent problem. They build a “solution in search of a problem”- something that might sound cool on paper, but which no real group of users genuinely needs. This leads to weak or no growth, which is fatal for a startup.

Choosing the right problem is the critical first step in your entrepreneurial journey. Having a well-defined, urgent problem is essential, because:

  • V It points you toward fast user adoption.
  • V It helps you gain conviction when resources are tight.
  • V It sets a clear path for product validation and fundraising.

What makes a "startup-worthy" problem?

A good startup problem is:

  1. Frequent – Happens regularly, not once in a while.
  2. Painful – Causes frustration, financial loss, wasted time, or emotional stress.
  3. Urgent – People are actively looking for a solution.
  4. Underserved – No great solution exists yet.
  5. Growing – The pain is increasing, not going away.
Food for thought:
Paul Graham calls these “wells” or “deep holes.” A great problem starts narrow but with intense need. Later you can expand. Start with a smaller set of really motivated users.

How to spot a problem worth solving?

  • Your own frustration: What annoys you?
  • Corporate inefficiencies: What tools/processes suck in your industry?
  • New regulations: Does CSIRE, ESG, or MiCA open new gaps?
  • Technology shifts: What can AI, IoT, or drones newly solve?
  • Demographic change: Aging, migration, remote work trends?
  • Emerging local markets: What worked in other geographies but doesn’t exist here?

Pitfalls to avoid

  • X “Cool idea” trap: sounds good but is not an urgent problem.
  • X “Tech looking for a problem”:  using specific technology (think: "AI",  blockchain, etc.) only because it's trendy but not necessary to solve a real user problem.
  • X Ignoring local context: something that works in Silicon Valley could flop in CEE.
  • X No competition = good: lack of competitors could signal no market demand - always validate with clients first.
  • X Everyone is the customer: if you want to appeal to an audience that is too broad, you might have difficulty finding your true believers first.
Food for thought: Reverse-engineer a startup
Pick any successful startup, and ask:
1. Which problem
did they solve?
2. Who
did they solve it for?
3. How
painful/urgent was it at the time?

Research
the origin story (articles, podcasts, blog posts).
Identify what made them stand out (timing, regulatory gap, local demand).
Reflect: could you apply similar logic in your problem-finding process?

Many startups fail because they don’t solve a genuine, urgent problem. They build a “solution in search of a problem”- something that might sound cool on paper, but which no real group of users genuinely needs. This leads to weak or no growth, which is fatal for a startup.

Choosing the right problem is the critical first step in your entrepreneurial journey. Having a well-defined, urgent problem is essential, because:

  • V It points you toward fast user adoption.
  • V It helps you gain conviction when resources are tight.
  • V It sets a clear path for product validation and fundraising.

What makes a "startup-worthy" problem?

A good startup problem is:

  1. Frequent – Happens regularly, not once in a while.
  2. Painful – Causes frustration, financial loss, wasted time, or emotional stress.
  3. Urgent – People are actively looking for a solution.
  4. Underserved – No great solution exists yet.
  5. Growing – The pain is increasing, not going away.
Food for thought:
Paul Graham calls these “wells” or “deep holes.” A great problem starts narrow but with intense need. Later you can expand. Start with a smaller set of really motivated users.

How to spot a problem worth solving?

  • Your own frustration: What annoys you?
  • Corporate inefficiencies: What tools/processes suck in your industry?
  • New regulations: Does CSIRE, ESG, or MiCA open new gaps?
  • Technology shifts: What can AI, IoT, or drones newly solve?
  • Demographic change: Aging, migration, remote work trends?
  • Emerging local markets: What worked in other geographies but doesn’t exist here?

Pitfalls to avoid

  • X “Cool idea” trap: sounds good but is not an urgent problem.
  • X “Tech looking for a problem”:  using specific technology (think: "AI",  blockchain, etc.) only because it's trendy but not necessary to solve a real user problem.
  • X Ignoring local context: something that works in Silicon Valley could flop in CEE.
  • X No competition = good: lack of competitors could signal no market demand - always validate with clients first.
  • X Everyone is the customer: if you want to appeal to an audience that is too broad, you might have difficulty finding your true believers first.
Food for thought: Reverse-engineer a startup
Pick any successful startup, and ask:
1. Which problem
did they solve?
2. Who
did they solve it for?
3. How
painful/urgent was it at the time?

Research
the origin story (articles, podcasts, blog posts).
Identify what made them stand out (timing, regulatory gap, local demand).
Reflect: could you apply similar logic in your problem-finding process?

Related Files

Download file
Download file
Download file
Related resources
No items found.