Understanding your market size is critical for any startup. This guide will explain TAM (Total Addressable Market), SAM (Serviceable Available Market), and SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market) – what they mean, how to calculate them step by step, and how to use these metrics both in investor pitch decks and for internal strategy.
Total Addressable Market (TAM) defines the total revenue potential for a product or service if one could achieve 100% market share. Essentially, it indicates the yearly sales volume for the entire market, assuming every possible customer purchased your product. TAM is usually represented either as the annual revenue of the market or as the total number of customers for the broadest relevant market for your offering. It assumes no competition and limitless reach – an unrealistic situation, but a useful mental exercise.
Serviceable Available Market (SAM) – a realistic subset of TAM. SAM is the portion of the total market that your business can actually target or serve, given your product/service characteristics and limitations. It factors in constraints like geography, regulatory limits, distribution channels, or product specialization that make only a slice of the TAM truly accessible to you. Essentially, SAM is the segment of the market that fits your product/service and business model, often defined by specific customer demographics, regions, or use cases.
Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM) – the attainable share of the market. SOM is how much of the SAM you can realistically capture in the near term, especially given your current resources and competition. This is often your target market share in the first few years of operation. For an existing business, SOM can be measured by your current annual sales (revenue) as a fraction of the SAM. For a new startup, SOM is typically an estimated achievable portion of SAM (e.g. the sales you project to reach in 3-5 years). SOM is by nature smaller than SAM, reflecting practical limits like competitor presence and finite marketing/sales capacity.
Investor Appeal: VCs look for startups targeting large markets. A sizable TAM suggests big growth potential. If TAM is too small, the startup’s ceiling is limited, which can deter investment. On the other hand, an extremely high TAM can signal a crowded space. Demonstrating a substantial but credible TAM can make your venture more attractive to investors, and indeed a large TAM can help justify higher valuation assumptions.
Strategic Planning & Focus: Market sizing forces founders to clearly define who their customers are and which segments to prioritize. TAM provides the broad context, but SAM and SOM help you focus on a specific beachhead market. Understanding your SAM ensures you concentrate resources on the part of the market you can actually reach now, rather than diluting efforts. It informs go-to-market strategy and product dev realistic sales goals (since SOM is essentially a near-term sales target based on market share). In short, TAM/SAM/SOM analysis guides where to allocate resources and which segments to target first.
Competitive Insight: Breaking the market into TAM, SAM, SOM naturally leads you to study competitors and market saturation. For example, if your SOM (target share) is, say, 5% of SAM, you’ll need to consider which competitor’s share you are capturing or how you’ll grow the market. This analysis, especially for SOM, can surface insights about competitor size, customer needs, or underserved niches.
Long-term Vision: Discussing TAM versus SAM can help articulate your future expansion plans. Perhaps your current SAM is a narrow segment, but TAM shows a much larger opportunity if you expand product features or go to new markets. Founders should have a vision for how to expand their SAM toward the TAM over time (e.g. new customer segments, international markets, or product lines).
Food for thought: TAM/SAM/SOM numbers are not static.
Initial TAM estimates may appear low, but they can increase as the product generates new demand or discovers additional use-cases. For instance, many tech giants began as startups with modest early TAM—take Facebook, for example, when the market for online social networks was still untested. As these companies evolved, the scope of their TAM grew significantly. Use TAM/SAM/SOM to guide planning, but be sure to revisit them over time.
Before diving into calculations, it’s important to understand the two primary approaches to estimate market size:
Top-Down Approach: start with broad industry figures and narrow them to your market. You typically begin with macro-level data – for example, a published total market size from an industry research report – and then apply filters or assumptions to arrive at the portion relevant to your business. Top-down often relies on third-party sources like industry analysts or consulting firms. For instance, you might take a report saying “the global fitness industry is $250 billion” and then estimate your niche as 5% of that, yielding a $12.5B TAM. The advantage is speed and ease – data from firms like Forrester, IDC or Gartner can give you a quick read on market size. However, top-down estimates can be less precise for your specific business. The available data might not segment the market exactly how you need (e.g. your product might cater to only a certain demographic or usage that the broad figure includes more of). Investors may also view a purely top-down TAM as too superficial if it appears you just “googled a number”. In short, top-down is useful for initial broad sizing and a sanity check, but it should be refined to reflect your target segment.
Bottom-Up Approach: build the market size from the ground up by aggregating micro-level data – essentially counting potential customers and multiplying by how much each would spend. Bottom-up analysis often requires more research, but it yields a customized estimate for your business. You might determine how many customers fit your target profile (using sources like customer surveys, census data, or industry databases) and then multiply by an expected annual revenue per customer. For example, if you’re selling a SaaS product to hospitals, you could find the number of hospitals in your target region and multiply it by your annual price per hospital. If there are 1,352 hospitals in your country and you plan to charge $1,000 per year per hospital, the TAM would be $1.352 million. Bottom-up is typically seen as more credible and accurate because it forces you to identify real drivers of revenue (customer count, pricing, penetration rates) rather than depending on generic market figures. Investors generally prefer bottom-up estimates since they demonstrate you have a concrete grasp of your customer base. The challenge is that bottom-up can be time-consuming and requires access to reliable data about customer numbers and behavior.
Food for thought: Value-Theory Approach
Suppose you’re creating a product in an entirely new category or significantly improving an existing one. In that case, you might estimate TAM by how much value (or cost savings, etc.) it provides to customers. Essentially, you gauge how much customers would be willing to pay for the benefit you offer, and multiply that by the number of potential customers. This can help when historical pricing data is not available. For example, if your innovation saves businesses $20,000 each per year in expenses, and ~50,000 businesses could use it, you’d argue TAM is $20,000 × 50,000 = $1 billion based on delivered value. Value-based TAM is more speculative, but useful to justify markets for truly novel products.
Which approach to use? Use both if possible. A top-down estimate shows if the space is interesting. Ensure numbers make sense in both directions—your bottom-up TAM shouldn’t contradict industry figures (if it does, double-check assumptions). When pitching, use bottom-up numbers but reference top-down as a cross-check or broader context (e.g. “We’re initially targeting a $500M segment of a $10B industry”).
Once you have TAM, you need to narrow it down to the portion you can actually reach or serve – that’s your SAM. Think of SAM as TAM, filtered by your business model’s limits and focus.
Step 1: Filter Your TAM
Narrow down your TAM by removing segments you can't or won't serve:
Essentially, systematically go through the TAM and ask: “Which of these potential customers can we realistically get or serve given our current focus and resources?”
Step 2: Calculate the Size
Once you've identified your target segment, calculate its value:
Remember: SAM is by definition ≤ TAM.
If your SAM is almost as large as your TAM, it means you are initially targeting nearly the whole market. If your SAM is a small fraction of TAM, it indicates a very focused beachhead (which can be a good thing – a well-defined initial market).
TAM Calculation:
SAM Filters:
SAM Calculation:
TAM Calculation:
SAM Filters:
SAM Calculation:
SOM takes it one step further – of the market you can target (SAM), how much will you likely win? You won’t capture 100% of your SAM, at least not immediately. SOM is essentially your market share projection. Calculating SOM involves understanding competition and your own go-to-market capabilities:
Step 1: Define your timeframe and context
SOM is often discussed as what you can capture in the short-to-mid term, such as the next 3-5 years, or at a certain stage of the company (e.g., by the time you scale up operations). Be clear if you’re talking about an initial one-year goal or a five-year goal.
Step 2: Estimate your market share
Determine what percentage of the SAM you can realistically capture based on:
Be realistic – claiming you will get 50% of the market in 2 years will be met with skepticism in most cases.
Step 3: Calculate SOM in Revenue
Simply multiply: SOM = SAM × Your Expected Market Share Percentage
Remember: SOM should always be ≤ SAM.
Food for thought: if your startup is already in market, calculating SOM is more straightforward -it’s your current revenue relative to the market size.
Finding good data is essential for accurate TAM and SAM calculations. While some resources work for both US and EU markets, each region has its own best sources.
Use a mix of sources. Often, you’ll start with a top-down number from an analyst report for a quick sense, then validate and adjust it with bottom-up data from census or industry sources. Triangulating from multiple reputable sources makes your TAM/SAM estimates much more convincing . And always cite the sources in your notes or pitch – it shows you did your homework and lends credibility - in a pitch deck, you might put a tiny source note on the slide for the data or be ready to provide the backup in Q&A.
Government databases are among the most reliable and often free resources. They frequently provide consumer demographic data—such as the number of households and income levels—which can assist in the B2C TAM. Similarly, national census data often includes information on the number of companies within a given industry, broken down by size, making it ideal for a B2B bottom-up TAM.
Global Resources
Company and investor databases such as PitchBook, Crunchbase, and Dealroom are especially relevant if you want to research your competitors in the tech space. They can tell you how many companies exist in a certain category or how much funding similar companies have (indirectly reflecting market interest).
When it comes to pitching investors, how you present your market size can greatly influence their first impression of your startup’s potential. Here are some guidelines for crafting a clear and impactful TAM/SAM/SOM section (often a single slide in a pitch deck):
As an example of good presentation: Early in Facebook’s history, their pitch deck didn’t claim “everyone on the planet” as TAM; instead, they highlighted the number of college students in the US – the segment they could serve then – which was a compelling case on its own. Investors bought into that focused vision of capturing colleges first, precisely because it was concrete. You can always expand your claims later, but credibility is built by being realistic at the start.
Beyond fundraising, TAM, SAM, and SOM are valuable tools for your own strategic planning and go-to-market decisions:
In summary, TAM, SAM, SOM are not just buzzwords for a slide – they are planning tools. They force you to quantify your assumptions about the market. They help avoid the trap of either thinking too small (getting stuck in a tiny market) or too big and unfocused (trying to boil the ocean). By clearly delineating these levels, you can make smarter decisions about where to play and how to win over time.
Understanding your market size is critical for any startup. This guide will explain TAM (Total Addressable Market), SAM (Serviceable Available Market), and SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market) – what they mean, how to calculate them step by step, and how to use these metrics both in investor pitch decks and for internal strategy.
Total Addressable Market (TAM) defines the total revenue potential for a product or service if one could achieve 100% market share. Essentially, it indicates the yearly sales volume for the entire market, assuming every possible customer purchased your product. TAM is usually represented either as the annual revenue of the market or as the total number of customers for the broadest relevant market for your offering. It assumes no competition and limitless reach – an unrealistic situation, but a useful mental exercise.
Serviceable Available Market (SAM) – a realistic subset of TAM. SAM is the portion of the total market that your business can actually target or serve, given your product/service characteristics and limitations. It factors in constraints like geography, regulatory limits, distribution channels, or product specialization that make only a slice of the TAM truly accessible to you. Essentially, SAM is the segment of the market that fits your product/service and business model, often defined by specific customer demographics, regions, or use cases.
Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM) – the attainable share of the market. SOM is how much of the SAM you can realistically capture in the near term, especially given your current resources and competition. This is often your target market share in the first few years of operation. For an existing business, SOM can be measured by your current annual sales (revenue) as a fraction of the SAM. For a new startup, SOM is typically an estimated achievable portion of SAM (e.g. the sales you project to reach in 3-5 years). SOM is by nature smaller than SAM, reflecting practical limits like competitor presence and finite marketing/sales capacity.
Investor Appeal: VCs look for startups targeting large markets. A sizable TAM suggests big growth potential. If TAM is too small, the startup’s ceiling is limited, which can deter investment. On the other hand, an extremely high TAM can signal a crowded space. Demonstrating a substantial but credible TAM can make your venture more attractive to investors, and indeed a large TAM can help justify higher valuation assumptions.
Strategic Planning & Focus: Market sizing forces founders to clearly define who their customers are and which segments to prioritize. TAM provides the broad context, but SAM and SOM help you focus on a specific beachhead market. Understanding your SAM ensures you concentrate resources on the part of the market you can actually reach now, rather than diluting efforts. It informs go-to-market strategy and product dev realistic sales goals (since SOM is essentially a near-term sales target based on market share). In short, TAM/SAM/SOM analysis guides where to allocate resources and which segments to target first.
Competitive Insight: Breaking the market into TAM, SAM, SOM naturally leads you to study competitors and market saturation. For example, if your SOM (target share) is, say, 5% of SAM, you’ll need to consider which competitor’s share you are capturing or how you’ll grow the market. This analysis, especially for SOM, can surface insights about competitor size, customer needs, or underserved niches.
Long-term Vision: Discussing TAM versus SAM can help articulate your future expansion plans. Perhaps your current SAM is a narrow segment, but TAM shows a much larger opportunity if you expand product features or go to new markets. Founders should have a vision for how to expand their SAM toward the TAM over time (e.g. new customer segments, international markets, or product lines).
Food for thought: TAM/SAM/SOM numbers are not static.
Initial TAM estimates may appear low, but they can increase as the product generates new demand or discovers additional use-cases. For instance, many tech giants began as startups with modest early TAM—take Facebook, for example, when the market for online social networks was still untested. As these companies evolved, the scope of their TAM grew significantly. Use TAM/SAM/SOM to guide planning, but be sure to revisit them over time.
Before diving into calculations, it’s important to understand the two primary approaches to estimate market size:
Top-Down Approach: start with broad industry figures and narrow them to your market. You typically begin with macro-level data – for example, a published total market size from an industry research report – and then apply filters or assumptions to arrive at the portion relevant to your business. Top-down often relies on third-party sources like industry analysts or consulting firms. For instance, you might take a report saying “the global fitness industry is $250 billion” and then estimate your niche as 5% of that, yielding a $12.5B TAM. The advantage is speed and ease – data from firms like Forrester, IDC or Gartner can give you a quick read on market size. However, top-down estimates can be less precise for your specific business. The available data might not segment the market exactly how you need (e.g. your product might cater to only a certain demographic or usage that the broad figure includes more of). Investors may also view a purely top-down TAM as too superficial if it appears you just “googled a number”. In short, top-down is useful for initial broad sizing and a sanity check, but it should be refined to reflect your target segment.
Bottom-Up Approach: build the market size from the ground up by aggregating micro-level data – essentially counting potential customers and multiplying by how much each would spend. Bottom-up analysis often requires more research, but it yields a customized estimate for your business. You might determine how many customers fit your target profile (using sources like customer surveys, census data, or industry databases) and then multiply by an expected annual revenue per customer. For example, if you’re selling a SaaS product to hospitals, you could find the number of hospitals in your target region and multiply it by your annual price per hospital. If there are 1,352 hospitals in your country and you plan to charge $1,000 per year per hospital, the TAM would be $1.352 million. Bottom-up is typically seen as more credible and accurate because it forces you to identify real drivers of revenue (customer count, pricing, penetration rates) rather than depending on generic market figures. Investors generally prefer bottom-up estimates since they demonstrate you have a concrete grasp of your customer base. The challenge is that bottom-up can be time-consuming and requires access to reliable data about customer numbers and behavior.
Food for thought: Value-Theory Approach
Suppose you’re creating a product in an entirely new category or significantly improving an existing one. In that case, you might estimate TAM by how much value (or cost savings, etc.) it provides to customers. Essentially, you gauge how much customers would be willing to pay for the benefit you offer, and multiply that by the number of potential customers. This can help when historical pricing data is not available. For example, if your innovation saves businesses $20,000 each per year in expenses, and ~50,000 businesses could use it, you’d argue TAM is $20,000 × 50,000 = $1 billion based on delivered value. Value-based TAM is more speculative, but useful to justify markets for truly novel products.
Which approach to use? Use both if possible. A top-down estimate shows if the space is interesting. Ensure numbers make sense in both directions—your bottom-up TAM shouldn’t contradict industry figures (if it does, double-check assumptions). When pitching, use bottom-up numbers but reference top-down as a cross-check or broader context (e.g. “We’re initially targeting a $500M segment of a $10B industry”).
Once you have TAM, you need to narrow it down to the portion you can actually reach or serve – that’s your SAM. Think of SAM as TAM, filtered by your business model’s limits and focus.
Step 1: Filter Your TAM
Narrow down your TAM by removing segments you can't or won't serve:
Essentially, systematically go through the TAM and ask: “Which of these potential customers can we realistically get or serve given our current focus and resources?”
Step 2: Calculate the Size
Once you've identified your target segment, calculate its value:
Remember: SAM is by definition ≤ TAM.
If your SAM is almost as large as your TAM, it means you are initially targeting nearly the whole market. If your SAM is a small fraction of TAM, it indicates a very focused beachhead (which can be a good thing – a well-defined initial market).
TAM Calculation:
SAM Filters:
SAM Calculation:
TAM Calculation:
SAM Filters:
SAM Calculation:
SOM takes it one step further – of the market you can target (SAM), how much will you likely win? You won’t capture 100% of your SAM, at least not immediately. SOM is essentially your market share projection. Calculating SOM involves understanding competition and your own go-to-market capabilities:
Step 1: Define your timeframe and context
SOM is often discussed as what you can capture in the short-to-mid term, such as the next 3-5 years, or at a certain stage of the company (e.g., by the time you scale up operations). Be clear if you’re talking about an initial one-year goal or a five-year goal.
Step 2: Estimate your market share
Determine what percentage of the SAM you can realistically capture based on:
Be realistic – claiming you will get 50% of the market in 2 years will be met with skepticism in most cases.
Step 3: Calculate SOM in Revenue
Simply multiply: SOM = SAM × Your Expected Market Share Percentage
Remember: SOM should always be ≤ SAM.
Food for thought: if your startup is already in market, calculating SOM is more straightforward -it’s your current revenue relative to the market size.
Finding good data is essential for accurate TAM and SAM calculations. While some resources work for both US and EU markets, each region has its own best sources.
Use a mix of sources. Often, you’ll start with a top-down number from an analyst report for a quick sense, then validate and adjust it with bottom-up data from census or industry sources. Triangulating from multiple reputable sources makes your TAM/SAM estimates much more convincing . And always cite the sources in your notes or pitch – it shows you did your homework and lends credibility - in a pitch deck, you might put a tiny source note on the slide for the data or be ready to provide the backup in Q&A.
Government databases are among the most reliable and often free resources. They frequently provide consumer demographic data—such as the number of households and income levels—which can assist in the B2C TAM. Similarly, national census data often includes information on the number of companies within a given industry, broken down by size, making it ideal for a B2B bottom-up TAM.
Global Resources
Company and investor databases such as PitchBook, Crunchbase, and Dealroom are especially relevant if you want to research your competitors in the tech space. They can tell you how many companies exist in a certain category or how much funding similar companies have (indirectly reflecting market interest).
When it comes to pitching investors, how you present your market size can greatly influence their first impression of your startup’s potential. Here are some guidelines for crafting a clear and impactful TAM/SAM/SOM section (often a single slide in a pitch deck):
As an example of good presentation: Early in Facebook’s history, their pitch deck didn’t claim “everyone on the planet” as TAM; instead, they highlighted the number of college students in the US – the segment they could serve then – which was a compelling case on its own. Investors bought into that focused vision of capturing colleges first, precisely because it was concrete. You can always expand your claims later, but credibility is built by being realistic at the start.
Beyond fundraising, TAM, SAM, and SOM are valuable tools for your own strategic planning and go-to-market decisions:
In summary, TAM, SAM, SOM are not just buzzwords for a slide – they are planning tools. They force you to quantify your assumptions about the market. They help avoid the trap of either thinking too small (getting stuck in a tiny market) or too big and unfocused (trying to boil the ocean). By clearly delineating these levels, you can make smarter decisions about where to play and how to win over time.