Imagine finding an unknown competitor who raised $12M, targets your exact customers, and plans to build the same features you're developing. Even worse, three prospects mentioned them in recent sales calls. This situation reveals a common problem: most competitor analysis looks backward. Instead of identifying emerging threats, companies often track established players and compare feature lists without understanding why customers choose alternatives.
By completing this lesson, you will be able to:
You need competitor analysis to make three critical decisions: pricing, features, and go-to-market strategy. Without understanding your competitive landscape, you risk building features nobody needs, pricing yourself out of the market, or targeting the wrong customers.
Don't start your competitor analysis by just listing similar products in a spreadsheet. You'll miss the bigger picture. Your true competition might not be another product—it could be a simple spreadsheet, a WhatsApp group, or customers choosing to do nothing. Remember, you compete with every option your customer considers.
Your competition is any option a customer might "hire" to solve their problem—including paid software, marketplace channels, improvised workflows, or the status quo. When we view choices through the job-to-be-done lens rather than product categories, we understand why teams stick with "good enough" tools. People switch only when new solutions provide benefits that outweigh costs and risks.
Imagine you're building software for boutique fitness studios in Poland. You visit a yoga studio owner in Warsaw who fits your target profile. She needs to keep her morning classes at least 80% full while minimizing administrative work and maintaining predictable cash flow. You assume she'll love your studio management software—you've studied Perfect Gym, Fitssey, and WodGuru and built better features than all of them. But when you pitch your solution, she hesitates. "I'm actually doing fine with Google Sheets and WhatsApp," she says. You're confused. That system must be a nightmare—no automated payments, no attendance tracking, no booking system. How is that "fine"?
What you have missed is that her Google Sheets solution costs nothing and she understands every cell. Yes, she spends extra time on administration, but she launched her studio with zero software costs and complete control. For a new studio watching every złoty, that matters more than automation. Then she mentions MultiSport—the corporate benefit card that sends her customers. They take fees and impose rules, but they fill her off-peak classes without marketing spend. That predictable stream of corporate customers solves her capacity problem better than any software feature.
Another studio owner down the street chose differently. He uses BodyVibes, which puts his classes in their marketplace app. He sacrificed control—BodyVibes stands between him and his customers—but gained instant discoverability. New customers find him without effort.
Suddenly you realize: You're not just competing against Perfect Gym or Fitssey. You're competing against:
Each solution wins in different scenarios:
Once you see competition this way, your strategy shifts. You stop comparing feature lists and start solving the real problem: proving your software delivers more value than free spreadsheets, more customers than specialized platforms (MultiSport), and more control than marketplace solutions (BodyVibes)—combined. You might even integrate with some of them rather than compete, or offer a free tier that beats the spreadsheet option.
Now that you understand competition differently, you need a systematic way to map it. The Who-What-How Framework reveals your complete competitive landscape through three fundamental questions:
Map out companies targeting the same audience. For project management software aimed at creative agencies, your competitors include traditional options like Asana and Monday. But don't forget less obvious alternatives: creative directors who embrace minimal structure, account managers relying on email, and producers tracking everything mentally. Each approach reflects a different work philosophy.
Your project management tool offers organization and efficiency. But email threads need no training and make everything searchable in Gmail. The creative director's less structured approach maintains flexibility and reduces process overhead. When you understand what each alternative delivers, you can position against their strengths rather than just their features.
Your software automates workflows. Consultants provide human expertise. Spreadsheets offer complete customization. Books teach methodology. Each delivery method appeals to different preferences and contexts. Some clients want technology. Others want relationships. Many want both.
Now you need to collect specific information about your competitors. This is where most founders get stuck—they either collect too little and guess, or they gather too much data and never act. The key is knowing what information matters and where to find it quickly.
To organize your research, create a competitor matrix. Use a spreadsheet with each column representing a competitor, including your own business. Rows should contain key metrics and information categories. Look at the example below.
Your competitor matrix captures key data points, but consider these less obvious ways to find a competitive edge:
Imagine finding an unknown competitor who raised $12M, targets your exact customers, and plans to build the same features you're developing. Even worse, three prospects mentioned them in recent sales calls. This situation reveals a common problem: most competitor analysis looks backward. Instead of identifying emerging threats, companies often track established players and compare feature lists without understanding why customers choose alternatives.
By completing this lesson, you will be able to:
You need competitor analysis to make three critical decisions: pricing, features, and go-to-market strategy. Without understanding your competitive landscape, you risk building features nobody needs, pricing yourself out of the market, or targeting the wrong customers.
Don't start your competitor analysis by just listing similar products in a spreadsheet. You'll miss the bigger picture. Your true competition might not be another product—it could be a simple spreadsheet, a WhatsApp group, or customers choosing to do nothing. Remember, you compete with every option your customer considers.
Your competition is any option a customer might "hire" to solve their problem—including paid software, marketplace channels, improvised workflows, or the status quo. When we view choices through the job-to-be-done lens rather than product categories, we understand why teams stick with "good enough" tools. People switch only when new solutions provide benefits that outweigh costs and risks.
Imagine you're building software for boutique fitness studios in Poland. You visit a yoga studio owner in Warsaw who fits your target profile. She needs to keep her morning classes at least 80% full while minimizing administrative work and maintaining predictable cash flow. You assume she'll love your studio management software—you've studied Perfect Gym, Fitssey, and WodGuru and built better features than all of them. But when you pitch your solution, she hesitates. "I'm actually doing fine with Google Sheets and WhatsApp," she says. You're confused. That system must be a nightmare—no automated payments, no attendance tracking, no booking system. How is that "fine"?
What you have missed is that her Google Sheets solution costs nothing and she understands every cell. Yes, she spends extra time on administration, but she launched her studio with zero software costs and complete control. For a new studio watching every złoty, that matters more than automation. Then she mentions MultiSport—the corporate benefit card that sends her customers. They take fees and impose rules, but they fill her off-peak classes without marketing spend. That predictable stream of corporate customers solves her capacity problem better than any software feature.
Another studio owner down the street chose differently. He uses BodyVibes, which puts his classes in their marketplace app. He sacrificed control—BodyVibes stands between him and his customers—but gained instant discoverability. New customers find him without effort.
Suddenly you realize: You're not just competing against Perfect Gym or Fitssey. You're competing against:
Each solution wins in different scenarios:
Once you see competition this way, your strategy shifts. You stop comparing feature lists and start solving the real problem: proving your software delivers more value than free spreadsheets, more customers than specialized platforms (MultiSport), and more control than marketplace solutions (BodyVibes)—combined. You might even integrate with some of them rather than compete, or offer a free tier that beats the spreadsheet option.
Now that you understand competition differently, you need a systematic way to map it. The Who-What-How Framework reveals your complete competitive landscape through three fundamental questions:
Map out companies targeting the same audience. For project management software aimed at creative agencies, your competitors include traditional options like Asana and Monday. But don't forget less obvious alternatives: creative directors who embrace minimal structure, account managers relying on email, and producers tracking everything mentally. Each approach reflects a different work philosophy.
Your project management tool offers organization and efficiency. But email threads need no training and make everything searchable in Gmail. The creative director's less structured approach maintains flexibility and reduces process overhead. When you understand what each alternative delivers, you can position against their strengths rather than just their features.
Your software automates workflows. Consultants provide human expertise. Spreadsheets offer complete customization. Books teach methodology. Each delivery method appeals to different preferences and contexts. Some clients want technology. Others want relationships. Many want both.
Now you need to collect specific information about your competitors. This is where most founders get stuck—they either collect too little and guess, or they gather too much data and never act. The key is knowing what information matters and where to find it quickly.
To organize your research, create a competitor matrix. Use a spreadsheet with each column representing a competitor, including your own business. Rows should contain key metrics and information categories. Look at the example below.
Your competitor matrix captures key data points, but consider these less obvious ways to find a competitive edge: